Biden Running on Fumes: Slurs His Way Through Evening Update on NOLA Terror Attack, Shuffles Away as Eerie Echo Picks Up

Does anyone recall the 25th Amendment?

It was invoked multiple times during Donald Trump’s first term, despite no concrete evidence questioning his mental capacity. Now, we face actual concerns about Joe Biden’s cognitive state — concerns that have been apparent since well before the June 27 debate debacle and his campaign suspension weeks later.

Yet, there’s no public outcry for a commander-in-chief who’s mentally alert. As we rang in 2025, the need for an active and capable president became strikingly clear — even if it means Kamala Harris steps in.

In the early hours of January 1, a suspected terrorist with ties to the Islamic State group drove a rented pickup truck into a crowd of revelers on Bourbon Street in New Orleans. The attack left at least 15 people dead and over 30 hospitalized, according to Reuters.

Authorities identified the suspect as Shamsud-Din Jabbar, a 42-year-old U.S.-born citizen from Texas and a military veteran. He was killed in a gunfight with police after the attack.

Initially, the FBI suggested Jabbar wasn’t a terrorist, despite “terrorist-like” devices found in his truck. However, by 2 p.m. Eastern, their narrative shifted.

“An ISIS flag was located in the vehicle, and the FBI is working to determine the subject’s potential associations and affiliations with terrorist organizations,” stated the FBI’s National Press Office.

The truck contained weapons and a possible improvised explosive device (IED), with additional IEDs found in the French Quarter. FBI bomb technicians are analyzing the devices to determine their viability and ensure public safety.

Alethea Duncan, assistant special agent in charge of the FBI’s New Orleans office, revealed that Jabbar likely didn’t act alone. “We do not believe that Jabbar was solely responsible,” she said, per USA Today. The bureau is now investigating a network of potential suspects.

What was President Biden’s response? As expected, he addressed the nation from Camp David. However, his slurred and disjointed delivery raised concerns about his coherence.

The president shared little new information, reiterating details already included in the FBI’s earlier press release. His remarks included the usual condolences: “Our hearts are with the people of New Orleans after the despicable attack that occurred in the early morning hours,” Biden said. “Our nation grieves with you.”

“We’re going to stand with you as you mourn and as you heal in the weeks to come,” he continued, thanking first responders for stopping the attacker before more lives were lost. He also assured the public that he had directed federal agencies to provide all necessary resources to investigate and address any remaining threats.

“May God protect our troops,” Biden concluded, before walking away without answering reporters’ shouted questions — including whether he had spoken with Trump about the attack.

What was the purpose of this appearance? Did we need a mere “proof of life” video from the president at such a critical moment? If so, was this shaky four-minute statement the impression his administration wanted to project?

A more productive response would have included a Q&A session with the press. Instead, Biden shuffled off, leaving the nation with more questions than answers.

It’s no secret that Biden is no longer regarded as “sharp as a tack.” Reports of his limited meeting schedule and the lack of engagement in critical discussions have persisted for some time.

The 25th Amendment exists for situations like this, though the prospect of Vice President Kamala Harris stepping in offers little solace. With Inauguration Day still weeks away and the FBI investigating what they believe is a coordinated attack, is it not time to consider the need for a leader fully present and capable of addressing such threats?