RFK Jr. Calls Out Harris Over Numerous ‘Lies’ During Debate
Former Independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. criticized Vice President Kamala Harris and ABC moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis after her debate with former President Donald Trump.
Appearing on Newsmax TV, RFK Jr. highlighted that inflation and the economy are major concerns in this election, topics Harris failed to address.
“We’re witnessing a generation of American kids who can’t afford homes. Gas, groceries—everything is unaffordable. People are cutting back at the checkout counter, seniors are splitting their medications to afford food or gas,” Kennedy stated.
“This is happening across the country. It’s the first time in American history that kids will likely be worse off than their parents. Harris has had four years to tackle these problems, and they’ve only worsened,” he added. “And the moderators, who were clearly biased, kept fact-checking Trump. But when it came to the vice president’s inaccuracies and her lack of answers to critical questions, they just stood by.”
Fox News host Greg Gutfeld described the Trump-Harris debate as a “DEI debate,” pointing out the blatant favoritism from moderators Muir and Davis, especially in their selective fact-checking.
“Well, I don’t know who won, but I know the American people lost. If the refs are corrupt, you have every right to complain,” Gutfeld said on “The Five.” “It felt like my brain was being waterboarded by the nonsense of these moderators.”
“I honestly don’t know how anyone can decide who won. It’s like guessing the price of a possibly forged painting. You can’t judge a winner in a sham contest,” he continued. “This was the first DEI debate where one candidate was held to a high standard, while the other had none.”
Gutfeld added, “They removed fairness to create an unscorable outcome. That’s why you can’t declare a winner. Liberals should be ashamed that their candidate needed such skewed odds.”
While much of the mainstream media declared Harris the winner, many debate viewers told Reuters they remained unconvinced she’s the better choice.
Reuters asked ten undecided voters to watch the 90-minute debate and share their thoughts. Six said they would likely vote for Trump, while three leaned toward Harris, and one remained unsure.
Several participants said Harris needed to take a more serious approach to her costly policy priorities.
Regarding the high costs of housing and household goods, five voters described Harris as “vague.”
“I still don’t know what she stands for,” remarked Mark Kadish, 61, an entrepreneur from Florida. “Her plans lacked substance.” Robert Wheeler, 48, a security firm executive in Nevada who had been leaning toward Harris, said her vague responses left him more inclined to support Trump, whom he said had tangible policies to back his promises.
“It felt like the whole debate was Kamala Harris telling me why not to vote for Donald Trump rather than why she’s the right candidate,” Wheeler added.