Trump Issues a Humorous Reprimand to Woke Admiral Who Refuses to Leave Government Residence

There are few words in the English language strong enough to encapsulate the arrogance of entrenched federal officials. Nor are there adequate terms to fully describe the media operatives who push propaganda on their behalf.

Fortunately, President Donald Trump, along with his sharp-witted representatives and millions of supporters, have become well-versed in recognizing federal officials and their allies as components of a broader self-serving network—one that thrives on exploiting everyday Americans, whom they seemingly hold in disdain. Such figures are best ignored, challenged, or even prosecuted when necessary.

According to the establishment-aligned NBC News, Trump’s Department of Homeland Security, which oversees the U.S. Coast Guard, was unnecessarily harsh on Tuesday when they removed the DEI-focused former Coast Guard Commandant Linda Fagan from what NBC’s reporters referred to as “her home” after allegedly providing her only three hours’ notice.

“It’s petty, and it’s personal,” stated an individual identified as a “Fagan ally.”

NBC did admit in the second paragraph that Trump had dismissed Fagan, a four-star admiral, on Jan. 21.

However, it wasn’t until the seventh paragraph—after attempting to frame Fagan as a victim—that NBC cited an anonymous DHS official who equated her continued residence in the government home to squatting.

“She was terminated with cause two weeks ago today, and she was still living in those admiral quarters,” the unnamed official revealed.

NBC further referenced a source who alleged that the Coast Guard had granted Fagan a 60-day waiver. Essentially, the claim suggested—contrary to logic—that an individual who no longer held a leadership position within the organization still had the right to reside in the quarters designated for its acting commandant.

But the most astonishing revelation was yet to come.

On Tuesday afternoon, DHS officials allegedly instructed Fagan to vacate the premises within three hours and to leave the residence unlocked for inspection and documentation.

Her response epitomized bureaucratic entitlement.

“I do not authorize them to come into my house, whether I’m there or not,” she informed a Coast Guard official.

“My house,” she insisted. Unbelievable.

Meanwhile, on the social media platform X, DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin took both Fagan and NBC to task.

“-@NBC calls US Coast Guard Admiral Quarters ‘her house’ not American taxpayers,” McLaughlin pointed out in a detailed rebuttal.

McLaughlin also highlighted NBC’s decision to push key details regarding Fagan’s Jan. 21 dismissal down to the seventh paragraph of their report.

Additionally, McLaughlin refuted the existence of the supposed “60-day waiver.” She further referenced allegations of an “alleged sexual assault coverup” under Fagan’s tenure and criticized her for “general incompetence.”

“Oh & maybe they should mention that she was given another place to live paid for by the US government,” McLaughlin added.

To be fair, NBC did “mention” that crucial detail—but only in the second-to-last paragraph of their article.

“She was given a different place to stay,” a DHS official disclosed to NBC. “We’re still providing her housing.”

Indeed, when one X user questioned why taxpayers were still covering Fagan’s living expenses, McLaughlin cited “federal law.”

In light of recent eye-opening disclosures from X owner Elon Musk and his team at the Department of Government Efficiency, one might wonder whether either Fagan or NBC has received backing from USAID, a government agency with connections to intelligence-driven propaganda. This agency has reportedly provided funding to left-leaning Politico and possibly other media organizations.

For now, such suspicions remain speculative. What is evident, however, is that Fagan—almost instinctively—exhibited an astounding sense of entitlement.

Since assuming office, Trump has wasted no time in dismantling the deep state. Figures like Fagan only underscore why the president’s swift action remains essential.